Freedom and theatre students

There is a parallel between Pseudolus' dilemma and the feelings of freedom expressed by the students. They are free to express themselves and try out a variety of personalities through characters. In no other profession can you change who you are on a regular basis and be considered to be sane and talented.

Ironies

Free –

to follow direction.
Each production has its requirements. Specific roles are involved, certain kinds of costumes, what the set looks like. As an actor works to learn the play and the cast comes together the piece takes on a life of its own. The director leads the cast to create a version of reality for the play. An actor may try on certain behaviors and make suggestions for their character, but the director will decide what works for the good of the play.
Free –
to be yourself (outside of a role).
While in the process of creating a character, the actor has to find the character within himself/herself. This freedom is limited by the choices made by the director, who has ultimate control over everything a character is and does. The process of discovering a character provides learning experiences for the actors. While expressing emotions as a character the actor finds where those feelings connect within himself/herself. When real life situations occur that touch those emotions, the actor is better able to understand them.
Free –
to explore different personalities (within the sphere of a character).
Where else can a person have a different personality on a regular basis and get away with it. Acting lets the students try out behaviors and attitudes without fear of rejection. I find myself wondering if it is somehow difficult to identify what is really you after so many roles. My discussions with the students lead me to believe that they are intelligent and thoughtful enough to know themselves and express themselves easily. Though they seem like extroverts, many of them are really quite shy.
Free –
to move (exactly where & how you are directed to move).
During the rehearsals for "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum" I observed how the movements onstage(blocking) are determined. For the scene "Impossible" two actors sing a song and move around the stage in mirrored movements. The characters are father and son and one sings a part then the other sings a similar part. As they do they perform the same movements on opposite sides of the stage. The process of creating the scene was painstaking, over and over again one actor would sing a line, move and gesture while the other observed him. Then the second actor would sing his line and move and gesture in the same way. They were free to work out what felt right for the characters, but restricted to what the character required.
Free –
to express emotions (the way your character should).
Within the bounds of the specific character and the interpretation of the play by the director the students are asked to try various gestures, postures and ways of expressing the lines. The director may ask what they feel is best for the part or may ask them to analyze the motivation of the character. Program Director Melba Martinez, Ph.D. puts it this way, "In creating a role, the actor must make choices about the character. Every character wants something from the other characters. What does your character want?"
Free –
to sing out loud (the words as they are written).
Those people who are not performers of some kind do not often sing out loud in public. Despite what musicals would have us believe, after childhood it is not really done to walk through a store singing a song. But in the theatre you can sing out loud if the feeling moves you. It is a very freeing and scary experience to suddenly burst into song. But in this scenario the words and music are already written and you must follow them.
Free –
to experiment (until it's the way the director wants it, then do it the same way for every performance).
When the time for performance is at hand, the rehearsals have been going on for weeks and every tiny thing about the show is embedded in your being, then you have to remember that each show is a new show and not only does the audience not know what will happen next, but neither does your character. Every time the scene is played the character must be there for the first time.
Back to top

Why the ironies don't matter.
Society's permission -
to be different

"If we didn't have theatre, we would not know what it means to be human." Theatre Program Director, Melba Martinez, Ph.D. In her studies of theatre and film Melba has investigated the theories of Louis Althussur and Michel Fouchault, who found that identity is constructed of vast systems of representation and that we reside in the narrow overlap between presentation and representation. Everything about a character is a representation so that you can portray the character accurately. In discovering how to represent a character actors have the tacit approval of society to be different. Martinez affirms that there is no higher state of grace than to be human and that actors are always in a state of reverence while creating a character.

One of the main responses from the students to my question, "What qualities set Theatre students apart from other college students?" was that they feel safe in theatre. Safe to be themselves no matter what that looks like. That in theatre they will be accepted and nurtured to find and develop their talents.

Self-discovery
When an actor portrays a character he/she must find that character within themselves. Expressing the emotions and recreating the experiences touches those involved in the process. It is not possible to walk a mile in the character's shoes without learning something about yourself. Exploring motivation and reliving an experience repeatedly cause the actors to examine their own motivations and find where the connections are within themselves.

SS: It seems like I think knowing how to express your emotions as well, because when you're acting, it seems to me, you know I only did a minor little bit of theatre in high school and was never any good at it, so, when you have to express emotions as a character does that help you better identify those emotions for when you are actually feeling them?
A: I think so
C: I think you feel it first and then express it.
B&D: Yeah. Yeah.
D: I think you can't express it onstage until you've watched yourself.
A: But the process of the work can also trigger another an emotional understanding of yourself so that you can make those connections.
D: True
A: You know what I mean. You can like uhh, uhh, uhh, I hate myself or whatever, but you don't really understand why. But if you're doing a role where the character hates himself, you're doing some character work, something might happen, something might trigger, and then suddenly you're like, "OK, I now get it." I mean it makes the performance richer but you've also learned a whole lot about yourself.

The feelings of acceptance and the opportunities for self understanding gained in theatre offset the limitations to their freedom that theatre imposes. The students also notice that even when their peers or society looks at them as freaks or weirdos there is also very often an element of jealousy that is expressed. Many people outside of theatre would love to have the talent or strength of desire to perform. When the applause begins the actors know that the audience admires their talent, hard work and perseverance. And that is what makes it all worthwhile.

Back to top

 

 

 

 

"Free" - the irony of    freedom
  >
What freedom could      mean to Pseudolus
  >
Why it might not be      a good thing

Freedom and theatre
  students
  >
Ironies
  >
Why the ironies      don't matter

s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s